Texts:
Revelation 7.9-17; Psalm 34.1-10, 22; 1 John 3.1-3; Matthew 5.1-12
On this All Saints Day, I should
like to turn to the Book of Revelation,
which purports to be a vision given to a fellow named John, who happened to be
in prison for the sake of Christ on the Greek island of Patmos. The vision he is given takes place largely in
heaven, and concerns things which ‘must soon take place’. An angel instructs him to write down what he
sees and make the contents available to each of seven churches in the region of
Asia Minor .
The Revelation to John is a
fascinating read on many different levels.
First, it is written almost entirely in a poetic-symbolic language which
scholars call ‘apocalyptic’. Apocalyptic
means, literally, an unveiling of the truth, which is kind’ve ironic, because
most readers find the symbols of Revelation
quite mysterious and impenetrable. The
book becomes much more readable if you happen to have (a) a vivid imagination
of the kind that is able to appreciate fantasy or science-fiction novels; and
(b) a fair-to-middling appreciation of Jewish literature and theology. If you have neither, then I’m afraid you will
continue to struggle! The book is also
fascinating because of the insight it gives into the self-understanding of
Christians who are being persecuted for their faith. Most scholars date the book as having been
written sometime in the final decade of the 1st century, when the
early persecution of Christians by the Roman state was just beginning to become
more pronounced. In many ways, the Book of Revelation was written to assure
a persecuted community of Christians that God remains faithful to his people,
and to encourage that community to also remain faithful to God, even in the face
of strong opposition. Not surprisingly,
the Book of Revelation became a firm favourite
of various persecuted churches down through history, while it has been hardly
read at all by churches that felt or feel ‘relaxed and comfortable’ with their
political environment.
Armenian martyrs 1916 |
So, ‘Who are the saints, and what
is their vocation or purpose in life?’
Well, according to the passage we read a moment a go, the saints are a
great crowd of ordinary Christian people who are marked by the following
characteristics:
- they are drawn from every language, tribe and ethnicity
- they stand before the throne of God and of Christ, ‘the Lamb’, praising God day and night
- they wear robes of white, and hold palm branches in their hands
- they are people who have survived something called ‘the great ordeal’
- their robes have been, rather strangely, washed white in the blood of the Lamb
- they are sheltered and protected from pain and evil by God
- the Lamb, again rather strangely, is their shepherd; he leads them toward something called the ‘springs of the water of life’.
Some of you may be asking, ‘What
was so wrong with the Roman state? In
what ways did it threaten Christian beliefs and values?’ The answer is at once stark and subtle. Starkly, the Roman emperor demanded the
absolute allegiance (even the worship)
of his citizens. He demanded that every
citizen of the empire bow before his image, as the embodiment of absolute
authority in heaven and on earth. What
this actually meant in daily life was much more subtle. Worshipping the empire meant accepting and
enacting its ethics. It meant accepting
that slaves, women and children were the property of men, and could therefore
be treated or mis-treated according to men’s whims and fancies. It meant accepting that those who were richer
than yourself deserved your fawning obeisance, while those poorer than yourself
were to be regarded as a resource to be exploited. It meant accepting the superiority of Roman
blood, such that the Roman state had a right to invade, subjugate and enslave
the peoples of other lands and nations. It
meant accepting your fate in life, and never questioning your station or
fortune.
You can now see, I am sure, why
Christians got themselves into trouble with the Romans. The early Christians preached a classless
society, a society in which it one’s social and ethnic markers were of no
relevance whatsoever. In Christ, they
believed, all the social distinctions which make men and women somehow ‘better’
or ‘worse’ than one another, has been done away with. In baptism, they believed, the human person was
immersed in Christ’s death and resurrection, putting to death their social and
economic significance in favour of a new identity which came as a pure gift
from God. That is why the Book of Revelation imagines the saints
in robes of white: white is the colour
of baptism; white is removing of every colour, all that one may or may not have
achieved in life, in order to accept the pure gift of God’s acceptance and
love. It is also why Revelation insists that not even the
threat of death should dissuade the Christian from their baptismal vow to obey
only Christ. For if, in baptism, the
Christian had already died to the authority of the world, why would being
killed, physically, make any difference at all?
If, in the end, it was only God’s acceptance that ultimately mattered,
what could the evils of state-sanctioned torture possibly steal away?
In the end, the Book of Revelation does not see even the
threat of violence and death as a power that is able to overcome the power of
God. For its vision of the saints is one
in which their refuge in God’s care has been won for them by the violent death
of their own Lord at the hands of the Roman state. Note well.
The blood that makes them clean is not the blood of their own martyrdom,
but that of their Lord Jesus, the one imaged as a slaughtered lamb. The saints persevere not because there is
anything special or heroic about them, but simply because they place their
faith and trust in Christ, who alone has overcome sin, evil, and death. They believe that he can carry them in his
wake, as it were, all the way to the banqueting room of heaven.
Let me conclude with a few remarks
about the relevance of this vision of the saints for our own time, our own
sainthood, if you like.
Since the upheavals of the
Reformation, the Western church has settled into a fairly cosy relationship
with the state. In our own time, most of
us have grown up assuming that the aims of our state authorities and the aims
of the church were more or less compatible.
We therefore assumed that there was nothing particularly odd about being
a good citizen as well as a good Christian.
I suspect it is time, however, to wake up from these assumptions, for
everywhere in the Western world, the state is departing from even the thin
veneer of Christianity. In Germany there
is no longer any doubt about this, of course, because there the state went on a
mid-twentieth-century rampage, which left the church in tatters because it
believed, even well into the second world war, that Hitler was a Christian—even
when he was hanging Swastikas in the churches and putting its more errant
clergy in prison. In allied countries,
however, many of us still believe that the state is more or less Christian, if
only because some of our political leaders claim to be churchgoers.
I put it to you, however, that the
time of multi-lateral co-operation between church and state is coming to an end
in the West. When the Australian state
refuses to engage seriously with Aboriginal people over the tragic consequences
of our colonisation; when it fails to care for people living in poverty; when
it locks people away for years at a time without there being any kind of trial;
when it proposes legislation in which anyone who expresses opposition to state
policy may be imprisoned without charge or even shot dead; when it refuses to
honour its obligations to asylums seekers under international law; then the
alliance between church and state has well and truly come to an end. In the present circumstances, it may well be
time for the Western churches to take out the Book of Revelation, to dust it off, and to begin a serious
study. For here is a book that may teach
us a great deal about how to be a saint when the state is showing every sign of
becoming a dangerous beast. I recommend
its vision of sainthood to you this morning.
Not as a curious historic relic, but at a model for our own life and
times.
No comments:
Post a Comment